So, you or your client was served with a Rule 45 subpoena in a lawsuit or arbitration in which you’re not involved. Responding to a Rule 45 subpoena takes time and money, and often assistance by an attorney. We've written…
On December 4, 2019, a New York Federal Court found it had personal jurisdiction over Vanderbilt University in an ADA Website Accessibility Case. Plaintiff Jason Camacho filed an ADA website accessibility lawsuit alleging that a website operated by Vanderbilt University…
Last month, the Colorado Federal Court granted dismissal of an FDCPA action for lack of personal jurisdiction. In this case, Plaintiff's counsel made the creative argument that by credit reporting, a collection agency subjects itself to jurisdiction in all 50 states. Well,…
A "Mary Carter" agreement is an agreement between a plaintiff and one or more, but not all, co-tortfeasor defendants which places a limit on the maximum liability of the settling defendant, and further provides that such sum will be reduced…
A recent Federal District Court ruling illustrates that the timeliness of objections to a Rule 45 Subpoena is critical. In Lula Williams, et al., v. Big Picture Loans, LLC, et al., No. CV 3:18-MC-1, 2018 WL 1368271, at *5 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16,…
When you or your client receives a Federal Rule 45 Subpoena to testify and/or to produce documents, a motion to quash may be a viable option, however there are other options to consider. When you or your client is involved…